Monday, January 14, 2008

Hi-Def Makeup

I was staying at the McMenamins Grand Lodge for a speech tournament over the weekend. When I woke up in the morning, I found a complementary copy of The Oregonian outside my door. I sat down and read it, because I had some time before I had to leave. In the Living section there was an article on Hi-Def Makeup. Come 2009, all television stations will be broadcast in High Definition. This article was about KGW, who will be switching soon. The makeup that they currently use, which is heavy stage makeup, will make the anchors look clown-like. So, they must use a special liquid makeup that will cover flaws. Because with hi-def TV, you will be able to see every little wrinkle, every crow's foot, every laugh line, because the resolution will be five times as sharp. I hate to talk about De Zengotita, seeing as I am no fan, but this seems to me to fall under one of his definitions of different realities. Seeing as there are quite a few of them, and all are very similar, I will not attempt to decide which this example would fall under. But there seems to be something inherently wrong with covering up all these things for the audience. Doesn't this send out image problems to everyone? How would like if you had to stare at a flawless face for 30 minutes? You'd be jealous and you know it. It's society's obsession with age, and it's back with a high tech vengeance.

5 comments:

Mercilly said...

Though I agree with the fact that it's wrong to hide every single imperfection, you have to ask would people rather stare at a flawless face for thiry minutes, or an ugly one. It's like popular actors, the ones that are seen as more attractive get more attention. I'm not sure if the same could be said about news anchors, (You don't really see anyone asking what there anchor crush is, like the term celebirity crush...)
I think we're all used to looking at pretty faces for a long time though, with movies/magazines in general.
In short, though I don't think it's a good thing, people would rather stare at an attractive face than ugly face when getting their news.

Gabriel Mathews said...

creepy thought.

Mercilly said...

Something I'd like to add:
However, how attractive a news anchor is shouldn't be a factor in what news station we watch. It goes back to the medium is the message, (the medium being the news anchor) and the content. We should be focusing on the content, but I guess the station still wants to be a lot of focus onto how pretty they can make their news anchors...

Zach Wood said...

I would like to bar McLuhan references from my blog. Thank you.

Mercilly said...

Ah, okay. I'll keep that in mind.